Chancellor v. United States

237 F. 194, 150 C.C.A. 340, 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 1956
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedOctober 16, 1916
DocketNo. 4426
StatusPublished

This text of 237 F. 194 (Chancellor v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chancellor v. United States, 237 F. 194, 150 C.C.A. 340, 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 1956 (8th Cir. 1916).

Opinion

HOOK, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiff in error complains of a conviction and sentence for violating Act March 1, 1S95, c. 145, 28 Stat. 693, by introducing intoxicating liquor from Texas into a part of the state of Oklahoma which was formerly Indian Territory. The circumstances are similar to those of the case of Jim Chancellor, No. 4425, 237 Fed. 193, - C. C. A. -, decided at this term. The evidence against the present plaintiff in error was so much more direct and convincing that it need not he referred to in detail. The other questions of law are the same and are accordingly found against him.

The sentence is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chancellor v. United States
237 F. 193 (Eighth Circuit, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
237 F. 194, 150 C.C.A. 340, 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 1956, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chancellor-v-united-states-ca8-1916.