Chancellor v. City of Elizabeth
52 A. 1130, 66 N.J.L. 688, 1901 N.J. LEXIS 130
Opinion
The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for-the reasons given in the opinion of- Mr. Justice Dixon. 36 Vroom 483.
For affirmance — Van Syckel, Fort, Garretson, Hendrickson, Bogert, Adams, Vredenburgh, Voorhees. 8.
For reversal — 'The Chiee Justice, Gummere. 2.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Chancellor v. City of Elizabeth, 52 A. 1130, 66 N.J.L. 688, 1901 N.J. LEXIS 130 (N.J. 1901).
52 A. 1130 (Chancellor v. City of Elizabeth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.