Chancellor v. City of Elizabeth
52 A. 1130, 66 N.J.L. 687, 1901 N.J. LEXIS 129
Opinion
The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for the reasons given in the opinion of Mr. Justice Dixon. 36 Vroom 479.
For affirmance — Van Syckel, Fort, Garretson, Hendrickson, Bogert, Adams, Vredenburgh, Voorhees. 8.
For reversal — Ti-ie Chief Justice, Gummere. 2.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Chancellor v. City of Elizabeth, 52 A. 1130, 66 N.J.L. 687, 1901 N.J. LEXIS 129 (N.J. 1901).
52 A. 1130 (Chancellor v. City of Elizabeth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.