Chance Pilkington Ltd. v. Visual Scene, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Chance Pilkington Ltd. v. Visual Scene, Inc.

488 So. 2d 155, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1126, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 11504

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 13, 1986·No. Nos. 86-735, 86-736·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Agreeing that the contacts with the State of Florida of both appellant Pilkington Brothers pic. and appellant Chance Pilking-ton Limited were sufficient to warrant the trial court’s exercise of personal jurisdiction pursuant to the long-arm statute, we affirm the order denying appellants’ motions to dismiss. § 48.193(l)(a), Fla.Stat. (1985); see Burger King Corp. v. Rudzewicz, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 2174, 85 L.Ed.2d 528 (1985); Waldrip v. Dyal Sales Co., 436 So.2d 418 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); Anson v. Lemperuer, 390 So.2d 478 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Agreeing that the contacts with the State of Florida of both appellant Pilkington Brothers pic. and appellant Chance Pilking-ton Limited were sufficient to warrant the trial court’s exercise of personal jurisdiction pursuant to the long-arm statute, we affirm the order denying appellants’ motions to dismiss. § 48.193(l)(a), Fla.Stat. (1985); see Burger King Corp. v. Rudzewicz, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 2174, 85 L.Ed.2d 528 (1985); Waldrip v. Dyal Sales Co., 436 So.2d 418 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); Anson v. Lemperuer, 390 So.2d 478 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980).

Affirmed.

Chance Pilkington Ltd. v. Visual Scene, Inc., 488 So. 2d 155, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1126, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 11504 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

488 So. 2d 155 (Chance Pilkington Ltd. v. Visual Scene, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related