Chance Pilkington Ltd. v. Visual Scene, Inc.
This text of 488 So. 2d 155 (Chance Pilkington Ltd. v. Visual Scene, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Agreeing that the contacts with the State of Florida of both appellant Pilkington Brothers pic. and appellant Chance Pilking-ton Limited were sufficient to warrant the trial court’s exercise of personal jurisdiction pursuant to the long-arm statute, we affirm the order denying appellants’ motions to dismiss. § 48.193(l)(a), Fla.Stat. (1985); see Burger King Corp. v. Rudzewicz, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 2174, 85 L.Ed.2d 528 (1985); Waldrip v. Dyal Sales Co., 436 So.2d 418 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); Anson v. Lemperuer, 390 So.2d 478 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
488 So. 2d 155, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1126, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 11504, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chance-pilkington-ltd-v-visual-scene-inc-fladistctapp-1986.