Chambliss v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Chambliss v. State

1915 OK CR 241, 151 P. 1197, 12 Okla. Crim. 601, 1917 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 228

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedSeptember 25, 1917

DocketNo. A-2370.

StatusPublished

This text of 1915 OK CR 241 (Chambliss v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chambliss v. State, 1915 OK CR 241, 151 P. 1197, 12 Okla. Crim. 601, 1917 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 228 (Okla. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error was convicted on an information charging that he did unlawfully have possession of one quart of whiskey and ten gallons of alcohol, with the intention of selling the same. On the 23rd day of September, 1914, judgment was rendered, and in accordance with the verdict of the jury, he was sentenced to be confined in the county jail for a period of sixty days, and to pay a fine of $100.00. Prom the judgment he appealed by filing in' this court on November^ 21, 1914, a petition in error with ease-made.

The proof on the part of the state, showing possession of the intoxicating liquors as charged, was uncontroverted. No brief has been filed, and when the ease was called for final submission, no appearance was made on behalf of the plaintiff in error. Thereupon, the Attorney General moved the court to affirm the judgment. The judgment herein is therefore affirmed. Mandate forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error was convicted on an information charging that he did unlawfully have possession of one quart of whiskey and ten gallons of alcohol, with the intention of selling the same. On the 23rd day of September, 1914, judgment was rendered, and in accordance with the verdict of the jury, he was sentenced to be confined in the county jail for a period of sixty days, and to pay a fine of $100.00. Prom the judgment he appealed by filing in' this court on November^ 21, 1914, a petition in error with ease-made.

The proof on the part of the state, showing possession of the intoxicating liquors as charged, was uncontroverted. No brief has been filed, and when the ease was called for final submission, no appearance was made on behalf of the plaintiff in error. Thereupon, the Attorney General moved the court to affirm the judgment. The judgment herein is therefore affirmed. Mandate forthwith.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1915 OK CR 241, 151 P. 1197, 12 Okla. Crim. 601, 1917 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 228, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chambliss-v-state-oklacrimapp-1917.