Chambliss v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Chambliss v. State

1914 OK CR 203, 144 P. 1197, 11 Okla. Crim. 687, 1914 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 98

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedNovember 21, 1914

DocketNo. A-2102.

StatusPublished

This text of 1914 OK CR 203 (Chambliss v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chambliss v. State, 1914 OK CR 203, 144 P. 1197, 11 Okla. Crim. 687, 1914 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 98 (Okla. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

PEB CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error' was tried and convicted on an information which charged the unlawful possession of fifty gallons of whisky and one gallon of wine, with the intention of selling the same, and on the 5th day of July, 1913, in accordance with the verdict of the jury, he was sentenced to be confined for sixty days in the county jail, and to pay a fine of two hundred and fifty dollars, and the costs.

Upon a careful examination of the record our conclusion is that this appeal is without merit. The information is sufficient and it appears that the plaintiff in error had a fair trial. The judgment of conviction is, therefore, affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PEB CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error' was tried and convicted on an information which charged the unlawful possession of fifty gallons of whisky and one gallon of wine, with the intention of selling the same, and on the 5th day of July, 1913, in accordance with the verdict of the jury, he was sentenced to be confined for sixty days in the county jail, and to pay a fine of two hundred and fifty dollars, and the costs.

Upon a careful examination of the record our conclusion is that this appeal is without merit. The information is sufficient and it appears that the plaintiff in error had a fair trial. The judgment of conviction is, therefore, affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1914 OK CR 203, 144 P. 1197, 11 Okla. Crim. 687, 1914 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 98, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chambliss-v-state-oklacrimapp-1914.