Chambers v. State

627 So. 2d 1100, 1993 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 186, 1993 WL 35242
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama·Decided February 12, 1993·No. CR-92-14·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

The appellant, Darius Chambers, appeals from the denial of his petition for post-conviction relief filed under Rule 32, A.R.Crim.P. The appellant made numerous allegations in his petition attacking his convictions for attempted sodomy in the second degree and for forgery in the first degree. The trial court held a hearing on the appellant's petition. However, the trial court made no "specific findings of fact relating to each material issue of fact presented," Rule 32.9(d), A.R.Crim.P. The state requests that this cause be remanded to the Circuit Court for Dallas County so that the trial court may make findings of fact. This cause is remanded for compliance with Rule 32.9(d). Due return should be filed with this court no later than 28 days from the date of this opinion.

REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.

All the Judges concur. *Page 1101

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chambers v. State, 627 So. 2d 1100, 1993 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 186, 1993 WL 35242 (Ala. Ct. App. 1993).

627 So. 2d 1100 (Chambers v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Newman v. State
728 So. 2d 672 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1998)
Owens v. State
716 So. 2d 239 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1997)
Twarog v. State
703 So. 2d 1022 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1997)
McMillian v. State
655 So. 2d 50 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1994)
Ex Parte Walker
652 So. 2d 198 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1994)
Chambers v. State
627 So. 2d 1101 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1993)