Chambers v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Chambers v. State

627 So. 2d 1100, 1993 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 186, 1993 WL 35242

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

DecidedFebruary 12, 1993

DocketCR-92-14

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 627 So. 2d 1100 (Chambers v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chambers v. State, 627 So. 2d 1100, 1993 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 186, 1993 WL 35242 (Ala. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

The appellant, Darius Chambers, appeals from the denial of his petition for post-conviction relief filed under Rule 32, A.R.Crim.P. The appellant made numerous allegations in his petition attacking his convictions for attempted sodomy in the second degree and for forgery in the first degree. The trial court held a hearing on the appellant's petition. However, the trial court made no "specific findings of fact relating to each material issue of fact presented," Rule 32.9(d), A.R.Crim.P. The state requests that this cause be remanded to the Circuit Court for Dallas County so that the trial court may make findings of fact. This cause is remanded for compliance with Rule 32.9(d). Due return should be filed with this court no later than 28 days from the date of this opinion.

REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.

All the Judges concur. *Page 1101

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The appellant, Darius Chambers, appeals from the denial of his petition for post-conviction relief filed under Rule 32, A.R.Crim.P. The appellant made numerous allegations in his petition attacking his convictions for attempted sodomy in the second degree and for forgery in the first degree. The trial court held a hearing on the appellant's petition. However, the trial court made no "specific findings of fact relating to each material issue of fact presented," Rule 32.9(d), A.R.Crim.P. The state requests that this cause be remanded to the Circuit Court for Dallas County so that the trial court may make findings of fact. This cause is remanded for compliance with Rule 32.9(d). Due return should be filed with this court no later than 28 days from the date of this opinion.

REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.

All the Judges concur. *Page 1101

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

627 So. 2d 1100, 1993 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 186, 1993 WL 35242, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chambers-v-state-alacrimapp-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack