Chambers v. Office of the Attorney General

672 F. App'x 15
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided December 9, 2016·No. No. 16-7090·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Per Curiam

Upon consideration of the motion for summary affirmance and the response thereto, it is

ORDERED that the motion for summary affirmance be denied and, on the court’s own motion, that the case be remanded to the district court for reconsideration of its dismissal of the complaint with prejudice and dismissal of the case in light of this court’s recent decision in Cohen v. Board of Trustees of the University of the District of Columbia, 819 F.3d 476 (D.C. Cir. 2016).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App. P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chambers v. Office of the Attorney General, 672 F. App'x 15 (D.C. Cir. 2016).

672 F. App'x 15 (Chambers v. Office of the Attorney General) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cohen v. Board of Trustees of the University
819 F.3d 476 (D.C. Circuit, 2016)