Chadwick-Miller Importers, Inc. v. United States

61 Cust. Ct. 675, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1769
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Chadwick-Miller Importers, Inc. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 59 Cust. Ct. 529
United States Customs Court·Decided August 30, 1968·No. No. R68/28; reappraisements R60/7694, etc. (Boston); No. R68/29; reappraisements R63/1630, etc. (Boston)·Published

Opinion

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise, the facts, and the issues are the same in all material respects as those in United States v. Chadwick-Miller Imports, Inc., et al. (54 CCPA 93, C.A.D. 914), the court found and held that export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (.b), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise which was exported from Japan and is covered by these appeals and that said value is represented by the invoice unit ex-factory prices, net packed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chadwick-Miller Importers, Inc. v. United States, 61 Cust. Ct. 675, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1769 (cusc 1968).

61 Cust. Ct. 675 (Chadwick-Miller Importers, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.