Chadwick-Miller Importers, Inc. v. United States
57 Cust. Ct. 814, 1966 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1331
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Chadwick-Miller Importers, Inc. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 59 Cust. Ct. 529 →
Opinion
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by -the foregoing protest consists of battery-operated mixers similar in all material respects to those the subject of F. B. Vandegrift & Co., Inc. v. United States (53 Cust. Ct. 231, Abstract 68674), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Chadwick-Miller Importers, Inc. v. United States, 57 Cust. Ct. 814, 1966 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1331 (cusc 1966).
57 Cust. Ct. 814 (Chadwick-Miller Importers, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
F. B. Vandegrift & Co. v. United States
53 Cust. Ct. 231 (U.S. Customs Court, 1964)