Chaddock v. Day

Michigan Supreme Court

Chaddock v. Day

1 McGrath 243, 75 McGrath 527

DecidedJune 28, 1889

StatusPublished

This text of 1 McGrath 243 (Chaddock v. Day) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chaddock v. Day, 1 McGrath 243, 75 McGrath 527 (Mich. 1889).

Pincite

Opinion

To compel respondent to entertain a complaint and issue a warrant for the violation of a village ordinance.

Denied June 28, 1889, on the ground that a license fee of $10 per month is excessive and unreasonable, and therefore void, and that an ordinance of a village requiring the payment of the license fee of $10 per month for the privilege of selling fresh meat on the village streets, in less quantities than one-quarter of the slaughtered animal, is in restraint of trade and not within the legislative power of the village to enact.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

To compel respondent to entertain a complaint and issue a warrant for the violation of a village ordinance.

Denied June 28, 1889, on the ground that a license fee of $10 per month is excessive and unreasonable, and therefore void, and that an ordinance of a village requiring the payment of the license fee of $10 per month for the privilege of selling fresh meat on the village streets, in less quantities than one-quarter of the slaughtered animal, is in restraint of trade and not within the legislative power of the village to enact.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 McGrath 243, 75 McGrath 527, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chaddock-v-day-mich-1889.