C.H. Sanders Co. v. BHAP Housing Development Fund Co.
910 F.2d 33
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided May 8, 1990·No. Nos. 1016, 1017, Dockets 89-6249, 89-6251·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The Government’s petition for rehearing misapprehends that our decision will oblige the Secretary to satisfy any judgment that might be rendered out of Treasury funds. It will not. The Secretary will be obliged to satisfy the judgment only out of non-Treasury funds that are available to him, if any. If no such funds are available, the Secretary will have no payment obligation.
The petition for rehearing is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
C.H. Sanders Co. v. BHAP Housing Development Fund Co., 910 F.2d 33 (2d Cir. 1990).
910 F.2d 33 (C.H. Sanders Co. v. BHAP Housing Development Fund Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ensign Financial Corp. v. Federal Deposit Insurance
785 F. Supp. 391 (S.D. New York, 1992)