C.G. v. J. H.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

C.G. v. J. H.

179 A.3d 440

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJanuary 17, 2018

DocketNo. 769 MAL 2017

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 179 A.3d 440 (C.G. v. J. H.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

C.G. v. J. H., 179 A.3d 440 (Pa. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 17^th day of January, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

Whether the Superior Court erred in affirming the decision of the trial court that a former same-sex partner lacked standing both 1) as a parent and 2) as a party who stood in loco parentis to seek custody of the child born during her relationship with the birth mother where the child was conceived via assisted reproduction with an anonymous sperm donor and the parties lived together as a family unit for the first five years of the child's life?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 17^th day of January, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

Whether the Superior Court erred in affirming the decision of the trial court that a former same-sex partner lacked standing both 1) as a parent and 2) as a party who stood in loco parentis to seek custody of the child born during her relationship with the birth mother where the child was conceived via assisted reproduction with an anonymous sperm donor and the parties lived together as a family unit for the first five years of the child's life?

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

179 A.3d 440, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cg-v-j-h-pa-2018.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack