C.G. v. J. H.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

C.G. v. J. H.

179 A.3d 440

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 17, 2018·No. No. 769 MAL 2017·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 17^th day of January, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

Whether the Superior Court erred in affirming the decision of the trial court that a former same-sex partner lacked standing both 1) as a parent and 2) as a party who stood in loco parentis to seek custody of the child born during her relationship with the birth mother where the child was conceived via assisted reproduction with an anonymous sperm donor and the parties lived together as a family unit for the first five years of the child's life?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 17^th day of January, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

Whether the Superior Court erred in affirming the decision of the trial court that a former same-sex partner lacked standing both 1) as a parent and 2) as a party who stood in loco parentis to seek custody of the child born during her relationship with the birth mother where the child was conceived via assisted reproduction with an anonymous sperm donor and the parties lived together as a family unit for the first five years of the child's life?

C.G. v. J. H., 179 A.3d 440 (Pa. 2018).

Pincite

179 A.3d 440 (C.G. v. J. H.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related