C.G. v. J.H.
This text of C.G. v. J.H. (C.G. v. J.H.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
C.G., : No. 769 MAL 2017 : Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Superior Court v. : : : J. H., : : Respondent :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 17th day of January, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is
GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:
Whether the Superior Court erred in affirming the decision of the trial court that a former same-sex partner lacked standing both 1) as a parent and 2) as a party who stood in loco parentis to seek custody of the child born during her relationship with the birth mother where the child was conceived via assisted reproduction with an anonymous sperm donor and the parties lived together as a family unit for the first five years of the child’s life?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
C.G. v. J.H., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cg-v-jh-pa-2018.