Centripetal Networks, LLC v. Keysight Technologies, Inc.

Opinion

Case: 24-2372 Document: 63 Page: 1 Filed: 06/09/2026

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

CENTRIPETAL NETWORKS, LLC, Appellant

v.

KEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., PALO ALTO NETWORKS, INC., Appellees ______________________

2024-2372, 2024-2373 ______________________

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2023- 00445, IPR2023-01329. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

DANIEL J. RICHARDSON, Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by AVIV S. HALPERN, Palo Alto, CA; ANDREI IANCU, Los An- geles, CA; LAURIE STEMPLER, New York, NY; JENNA FULLER, JEFFREY PRICE, Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer (US) LLP, New York, NY; JAMES R. HANNAH, Redwood Shores, CA.

JONATHAN IAIN MAX DETRIXHE, Reed Smith LLP, San Case: 24-2372 Document: 63 Page: 2 Filed: 06/09/2026

Francisco, CA, argued for all appellees. Appellee Keysight Technologies, Inc. also represented by JONAH D. MITCHELL; GERARD M. DONOVAN, Washington, DC; JAMES CHRISTOPHER MARTIN, Pittsburgh, PA.

ANDREW T. RADSCH, Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP, San Francisco, CA, for appellee Palo Alto Networks, Inc. ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LOURIE, CUNNINGHAM, and STARK, Cir- cuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

June 9, 2026 Date