Centripetal Networks, LLC v. Keysight Technologies, Inc.
Opinion
Case: 24-1930 Document: 53 Page: 1 Filed: 01/12/2026
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
CENTRIPETAL NETWORKS, LLC, Appellant
v.
KEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Appellee ______________________
2024-1930 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2022- 01607. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
ANDREI IANCU, Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, Los Angeles, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by AVIV S. HALPERN, Palo Alto, CA; DANIEL J. RICHARDSON, JEFFREY B. WALL, Washington, DC; LAURIE STEMPLER, New York, NY; PAUL J. ANDRE, JAMES R. HANNAH, Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer (US) LLP, Redwood Shores, CA; JEFFREY PRICE, New York, NY.
JONATHAN IAIN MAX DETRIXHE, Reed Smith LLP, San Francisco, CA, argued for appellee. Also represented by Case: 24-1930 Document: 53 Page: 2 Filed: 01/12/2026
JONAH D. MITCHELL; GERARD M. DONOVAN, Washington, DC; JAMES CHRISTOPHER MARTIN, Pittsburgh, PA. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (Before REYNA and CHEN, Circuit Judges, and FREEMAN, District Judge. 1) AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
January 12, 2026 Date
1 Honorable Beth Labson Freeman, District Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Centripetal Networks, LLC v. Keysight Technologies, Inc. (Centripetal Networks, LLC v. Keysight Technologies, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.