Central Wharf & Wet Dock Corp. v. Proprietors of India Wharf

123 Mass. 567, 1878 Mass. LEXIS 200
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided January 5, 1878·Published·Cited by 17 cases

Opinion

Gray, C. J.

The only easement which the plaintiff acquired under the indentures upon which the rights of the parties de[570] pend was of an open dock and common passageway for ships, boats and other waterborne craft. All the covenants, including that against erecting fixtures or buildings of any kind within the bounds of the dock, were incidental to the grant of this easement. The laying out of a street and filling up of the dock by the city, under authority conferred by statute, made the enjoyment of this easement impossible, and thereby extinguished it. Hancock v. Wentworth, 5 Met. 446. Canny v. Andrews, ante, 155. Mussey v. Union Wharf, 41 Maine, 34. 3 Toullier Droit Civil (5th ed.) 522. The plaintiff’s remedy for the destruction of this easement was by application for damages against the city under the St. of 1867, a. 324. Judgment for the defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Central Wharf & Wet Dock Corp. v. Proprietors of India Wharf, 123 Mass. 567, 1878 Mass. LEXIS 200 (Mass. 1878).

123 Mass. 567 (Central Wharf & Wet Dock Corp. v. Proprietors of India Wharf) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Melrose Fish & Game Club, Inc. v. Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co.
52 N.E.3d 1089 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 2016)
First National Bank of Boston v. Konner
367 N.E.2d 1174 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1977)
American Oil Company v. Leaman
101 S.E.2d 540 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1958)
Hudson v. American Oil Company
152 F. Supp. 757 (E.D. Virginia, 1957)
Makepeace Bros. v. Town of Barnstable
198 N.E. 922 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1935)
Lund v. Cox
183 N.E. 714 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1933)
Beim v. Carlson
227 N.W. 421 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1929)
Brooks v. West Boston Gas Co.
157 N.E. 362 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1927)
Inhabitants of Brookline v. Whidden
229 Mass. 485 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1918)
Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. Sioux City Stockyards Co.
176 Iowa 659 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1916)
McArthur v. Hood Rubber Co.
109 N.E. 162 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1915)
Wellington v. City of Cambridge
100 N.E. 1096 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1913)
Cornell-Andrews Smelting Co. v. Boston & Providence Railroad
89 N.E. 118 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1909)
McLoud v. Hall
1 Davis. L. Ct. Cas. 186 (Massachusetts Land Court, 1904)
Southern Ry. Co. v. City of Memphis
97 F. 819 (Sixth Circuit, 1899)
Bangs v. Potter
135 Mass. 245 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1883)