Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Wood

30 S.E. 933, 105 Ga. 499, 1898 Ga. LEXIS 623
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided June 8, 1898·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Lumpkin, P. J.

This being an action against a railway company for the killing of live stock by a train; in which the plaintiff’s alleged right to recover depended upon the presumption of negligence raised [500]*500by law against the defendant, and the uncontradieted evidence in its behalf showing that its servants in charge of the train exercised ordinary care and diligence in endeavoring to prevent the collision, this presumption was rebutted, and consequently the verdict against the company was contrary to law and should have been set aside. '

Argued May 23, Decided June 8, 1898. Action-for damages. Before Judge Callaway. Washington superior court. September term, 1897. Lawton & Cunningham and Rawlings & Hardwick, for plain- ' tiff in error. Evans & Evans, contra.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Wood, 30 S.E. 933, 105 Ga. 499, 1898 Ga. LEXIS 623 (Ga. 1898).

30 S.E. 933 (Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Wood) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sellers v. State
130 S.E.2d 790 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1963)
Lankford v. Holton
200 S.E. 243 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1938)
Richards v. Oregon Short Line Railroad
123 P. 933 (Utah Supreme Court, 1912)
Seaboard Air-Line Railway v. Walthour
43 S.E. 720 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1903)