Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Hartley

103 S.E. 262, 25 Ga. App. 120, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 636
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Hartley. Read the opinion of the Court — 25 Ga. App. 110
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided April 7, 1920·No. 11199·Published

Opinion

Jenkins, P. J.

This case is controlled in nearly every particular by the rulings this day made in Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Hartley, ante, 110, -which was a suit by another plaintiff growing out of the same transaction. In the instant case the judge did not abuse his discretion in overruling the motion for continuance. Nor do we feel justified in holding that the amount of the verdict is excessive. Por none of the reasons assigned do we feel authorized to set the verdict aside.

Judgment affirmed.

Stephens and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Hartley, 103 S.E. 262, 25 Ga. App. 120, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 636 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

103 S.E. 262 (Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Hartley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.