Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Harden

89 S.E. 432, 18 Ga. App. 392, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 367
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided July 6, 1916·No. 7300·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Bboyles, J.

1. The petition showed no misjoinder of parties defendant. 2. Under the ruling in Higgins v. Southern Ry. Co., 98 Ga. 751 (25 S. E. 837), Smith v. Savannah Ry. Co., 100 Ga. 96 (27 S. E. 725), Brunswick & Western R. Co. v. Bostwick, 100 Ga. 96 (27 S. E. 725), Savannah Ry. Co. v. Godkin, 104 Ga. 655 (30 S. E. 378, 69 Am. St. R. 187), and McIver v. Florida Central R. Co., 110 Ga. 223 (36 S. E. 775, 65 L. R. A. 437), the court did not err in overruling the demurrers to the petition.

3. The request of counsel for the plaintiff in error that the question involved in this ease be certified to the Supreme Court, for the purpose of having the ruling in the above cited cases reviewed and modified or overruled, is, upon consideration, declined. Judgment affirmed.

Lawton & Cunningham, E. W. Johnson, for plaintiff in error. Osborne, Lawrence & Abrahams, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Harden, 89 S.E. 432, 18 Ga. App. 392, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 367 (Ga. Ct. App. 1916).

89 S.E. 432 (Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Harden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Harden v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.
94 S.E. 263 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
Georgia Southern & Florida Railway Co. v. Thomas
90 S.E. 80 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)