Cent. Square Teachers Ass'n v. Bd. of Educ. of the Cent. Square Cent. Sch. Dist.
This text of 419 N.E.2d 341 (Cent. Square Teachers Ass'n v. Bd. of Educ. of the Cent. Square Cent. Sch. Dist.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
By express provision both of the “Statement of Grievance” and of the agreement reached by the parties at the commencement of the arbitration the issue submitted for resolution was whether the district had violated article II (subd G) or article XXVII (subd A), or both, of the collective bargaining agreement by assigning teachers in the junior high school to cafeteria duty. The arbitrator concluded: “This grievance is upheld” — a determination in favor of the teachers association of the precise issue submitted. The path of analysis, proof and persuasion by which the arbitrator reached this conclusion is beyond judicial scrutiny. The issue resolved having been the issue tendered, and the resolution not being wholly irrational, there is no occasion for judicial intervention.
Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur in memorandum.
Order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
419 N.E.2d 341, 52 N.Y.2d 918, 437 N.Y.S.2d 663, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2156, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cent-square-teachers-assn-v-bd-of-educ-of-the-cent-square-cent-sch-ny-1981.