Cellco Partnership v. Litman
179 L. Ed. 2d 1184, 131 S. Ct. 2872, 563 U.S. 971, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 3383
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMay 2, 2011
DocketNo. 10-398; No. 10-551
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases
This text of 179 L. Ed. 2d 1184 (Cellco Partnership v. Litman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Cellco Partnership v. Litman, 179 L. Ed. 2d 1184, 131 S. Ct. 2872, 563 U.S. 971, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 3383 (U.S. 2011).
Opinion
Petitions for writs of cer-tiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and cases remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit for further consideration in light of AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, 563 U.S. 333, 131 S. Ct. 1740, 179 L. Ed. 2d 742 (2011).
Same cases below, 381 Fed. Appx. 140.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Saheli v. White Memorial Medical Center
California Court of Appeal, 2018
Saheli v. White Mem'l Med. Ctr.
230 Cal. Rptr. 3d 258 (California Court of Appeals, 5th District, 2018)
Robinson v. Title Lenders, Inc.
364 S.W.3d 505 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 2012)
Litman v. Cellco Partnership
655 F.3d 225 (Third Circuit, 2011)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
179 L. Ed. 2d 1184, 131 S. Ct. 2872, 563 U.S. 971, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 3383, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cellco-partnership-v-litman-scotus-2011.