Cellco Partnership v. Litman
179 L. Ed. 2d 1184, 131 S. Ct. 2872, 563 U.S. 971, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 3383
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided May 2, 2011·No. No. 10-398; No. 10-551·Published·Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
Petitions for writs of cer-tiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and cases remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit for further consideration in light of AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, 563 U.S. 333, 131 S. Ct. 1740, 179 L. Ed. 2d 742 (2011).
Same cases below, 381 Fed. Appx. 140.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cellco Partnership v. Litman, 179 L. Ed. 2d 1184, 131 S. Ct. 2872, 563 U.S. 971, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 3383 (U.S. 2011).
179 L. Ed. 2d 1184 (Cellco Partnership v. Litman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Saheli v. White Memorial Medical Center
California Court of Appeal, 2018
Saheli v. White Mem'l Med. Ctr.
230 Cal. Rptr. 3d 258 (California Court of Appeals, 5th District, 2018)
Robinson v. Title Lenders, Inc.
364 S.W.3d 505 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 2012)
Litman v. Cellco Partnership
655 F.3d 225 (Third Circuit, 2011)