Home/Supreme Court/Celcom Communications Corp. of Pennsylvania v. Federal Communications Commission

Celcom Communications Corp. of Pennsylvania v. Federal Communications Commission

479 U.S. 1102, 107 S. Ct. 1333, 94 L. Ed. 2d 184, 55 U.S.L.W. 3571, 1987 U.S. LEXIS 902
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedFebruary 23, 1987
DocketNo. 86-830
StatusPublished
Cited by35 cases

This text of 479 U.S. 1102 (Celcom Communications Corp. of Pennsylvania v. Federal Communications Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Celcom Communications Corp. of Pennsylvania v. Federal Communications Commission, 479 U.S. 1102, 107 S. Ct. 1333, 94 L. Ed. 2d 184, 55 U.S.L.W. 3571, 1987 U.S. LEXIS 902 (1987).

Opinion

C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice Scalia took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Contractor's Supply of Waterbury, LLC v. Commissioner of Environmental Protection
925 A.2d 1071 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2007)
Consolidated Rail Corp. v. United Transportation Union
947 F. Supp. 168 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1996)
In Re Rausch
197 B.R. 109 (D. Nevada, 1996)
Holmes v. California Army National Guard
920 F. Supp. 1510 (N.D. California, 1996)
Watson v. Perry
918 F. Supp. 1403 (W.D. Washington, 1996)
96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 839, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 1369 Tomas Armendariz Rosa C. Armendariz Harry Julian Brown, Jr. Lance A. Bukouskis v. James F. Penman W.R. Holcomb David M. Stachowski Cecil Dillard Kenneth J. Henderson, Tomas Armendariz Rosa C. Armendariz Harry Julian Brown, Jr. Lance A. Bukouskis v. James F. Penman W.R. Holcomb David M. Stachowski Cecil Dillard Kenneth J. Henderson, and Al Boughey Larry Reed, Tomas Armendariz Rosa C. Armendariz v. James F. Penman
75 F.3d 1311 (Ninth Circuit, 1996)
Armendariz v. Penman
75 F.3d 1311 (Ninth Circuit, 1996)
United States Ex Rel. Sequoia Orange Co. v. Sunland Packing House Co.
912 F. Supp. 1325 (E.D. California, 1995)
95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7463, 95 Daily Journal D.A.R. 12,799 Maria O'Neal v. City of Seattle Norman Rice, Mayor of the City of Seattle Robert Groncznack, Director of the Seattle Water Department
66 F.3d 1064 (Ninth Circuit, 1995)
O'Neal v. City of Seattle
66 F.3d 1064 (Ninth Circuit, 1995)
95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6655, 95 Daily Journal D.A.R. 11,414, 95 Daily Journal D.A.R. 11,501 Michael Saunders, a Minor, by and Through His Guardian, Mary Ann Saunders v. United States
64 F.3d 482 (Ninth Circuit, 1995)
Saunders ex rel. Saunders v. United States
64 F.3d 482 (Ninth Circuit, 1995)
Ojeda v. Reed
901 S.W.2d 604 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1995)
United Transportation Union v. Springfield Terminal Co.
869 F. Supp. 42 (D. Maine, 1994)
Cammermeyer v. Aspin
850 F. Supp. 910 (W.D. Washington, 1994)
Dahl v. Secretary of the United States Navy
830 F. Supp. 1319 (E.D. California, 1993)
Drummond v. Department of Revenue
986 F.2d 1308 (Ninth Circuit, 1993)
In Re: Kurth Ranch
986 F.2d 1308 (Ninth Circuit, 1993)
Mountain Water Company v. Montana Department of Public Service Regulation Montana Public Service Commission
919 F.2d 593 (Ninth Circuit, 1990)
Maher v. NJ TRANS. RAIL OPERATIONS
570 A.2d 1289 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
479 U.S. 1102, 107 S. Ct. 1333, 94 L. Ed. 2d 184, 55 U.S.L.W. 3571, 1987 U.S. LEXIS 902, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/celcom-communications-corp-of-pennsylvania-v-federal-communications-scotus-1987.