Cedric Charles Figgs v. State
This text of Cedric Charles Figgs v. State (Cedric Charles Figgs v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed June 16, 2011.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
___________________
NO. 14-11-00441-CR
CEDRIC CHARLES FIGGS, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 21st District Court
Washington County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 15,824
MEMORANDUM OPINION
This is an attempted appeal from the denial of appellant’s “motion to dismiss prosecution.” The record does not contain a final judgment of conviction. The trial court entered a certification of defendant’s right of appeal in which the court certified that “[t]here being no final judgment or final order signed by this [court] and there being no Interlocutory right to appeal, the [court] finds Defendant has no right to appeal at this time.” See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2) and (d). The record supports the trial court’s certification. See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 615 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).
Generally, an appellate court has jurisdiction only to consider an appeal by a criminal defendant where there has been a final judgment of conviction. Workman v. State, 170 Tex. Crim. 621, 343 S.W.2d 446, 447 (1961); McKown v. State, 915 S.W.2d 160, 161 (Tex. App.CFort Worth 1996, no pet.). Exceptions include: (1) certain appeals while on deferred adjudication community supervision, Kirk v. State, 942 S.W.2d 624, 625 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997); (2) appeals from the denial of a motion to reduce bond, Tex. R. App. P. 31.1; McKown, 915 S.W.2d at 161; and (3) certain appeals from the denial of habeas corpus relief, Wright v. State, 969 S.W.2d 588, 589 (Tex. App.CDallas 1998, no pet.); McKown, 915 S.W.2d at 161.
The denial of a motion to dismiss is not a separately appealable order. Because we have no jurisdiction, the appeal is ordered dismissed.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Anderson, Brown, and Christopher.
Do Not Publish C Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Cedric Charles Figgs v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cedric-charles-figgs-v-state-texapp-2011.