Cedillos v. Masumoto

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cedillos v. Masumoto. Read the opinion of the Court — 136 Haw. 430
Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided October 13, 2015·No. SCWC-13-0000107·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-13-0000107

SCWC-13-0000107 13-OCT-2015 11:30 AM

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII

PHILIP CEDILLOS, Petitioner/Plaintiff/ Counterclaim Defendant-Appellant,

vs.

PATRICIA MASUMOTO, Respondent/Defendant/ Counterclaim Plaintiff-Appellee.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-13-0000107; DC-CIVIL NO. 12-1-2171)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Petitioner/Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Appellant Philip Cedillos’s application for writ of certiorari filed on August 31, 2015, is hereby accepted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no oral argument will be heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the Hawaii Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for retention of oral argument.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, October 13, 2015.

Philip Cedillos /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald petitioner pro se /s/ Paula A. Nakayama

Matson Kelley for respondent /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cedillos v. Masumoto, (haw 2015).

Cedillos v. Masumoto (Cedillos v. Masumoto) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.