Cedillos v. Masumoto
This text of Cedillos v. Masumoto (Cedillos v. Masumoto) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-13-0000107 SCWC-13-0000107 13-OCT-2015 11:30 AM IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII ________________________________________________________________
PHILIP CEDILLOS, Petitioner/Plaintiff/ Counterclaim Defendant-Appellant,
vs.
PATRICIA MASUMOTO, Respondent/Defendant/ Counterclaim Plaintiff-Appellee. ________________________________________________________________
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-13-0000107; DC-CIVIL NO. 12-1-2171)
ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)
Petitioner/Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Appellant Philip Cedillos’s application for writ of certiorari filed on August 31, 2015, is hereby accepted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no oral argument will be heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the Hawaii Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for retention of oral argument. DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, October 13, 2015.
Philip Cedillos /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald petitioner pro se /s/ Paula A. Nakayama Matson Kelley for respondent /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Richard W. Pollack
/s/ Michael D. Wilson
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Cedillos v. Masumoto, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cedillos-v-masumoto-haw-2015.