CECILY TERRY v. SHARMAYNE MADDEN
This text of CECILY TERRY v. SHARMAYNE MADDEN (CECILY TERRY v. SHARMAYNE MADDEN) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,____________________ June 14, 2024
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A24A1593. CECILY TERRY v. SHARMAYNE MADDEN et al.
The trial court entered final decrees permitting the adoption of two minor children. Six months later, Cecily Terry, the children’s biological mother, filed a motion to set aside the decrees under OCGA § 9-11-60 (d) (3). The trial court denied Terry’s motion, and she appeals directly to this Court. We lack jurisdiction. An appeal from the denial of a motion to set aside a final judgment under OCGA § 9-11-60 (d) must be made by application for discretionary appeal. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (8), (b); Jim Ellis Atlanta, Inc. v. Adamson, 283 Ga. App. 116, 116 (640 SE2d 688) (2006). “Compliance with the discretionary appeals procedure is jurisdictional.” Smoak v. Dept. of Human Resources, 221 Ga. App. 257, 257 (471 SE2d 60) (1996). Because Terry failed to follow the requisite discretionary application procedure, we lack jurisdiction to consider this appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 06/14/2024 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
CECILY TERRY v. SHARMAYNE MADDEN, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cecily-terry-v-sharmayne-madden-gactapp-2024.