Cecil B. Sanner and Mary W. Sanner v. The Trustees of the Sheppard and Enoch Pratt Hospital

398 F.2d 226
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 9, 1968·No. 12207·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Except for an important statutory relaxation 1 in 1966, Maryland judicially adheres to the so called doctrine of charitable immunity. Ordinarily such a matter is one of state law. Erie R. R. v. Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64, 58 S.Ct. 817, 82 L.Ed. 1188 (1938). We have carefully considered plaintiff’s interesting contention that the state of Maryland may not constitutionally cling to this judge-made, and increasingly questioned, doctrine. We reject the contention and affirm the granting of summary judgment in favor of the charitable institution, D.C., 278 F.Supp. 138.

Affirmed.

1

. Maryland Code Annotated Art. 43 §, 556A (Supp.1966).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cecil B. Sanner and Mary W. Sanner v. The Trustees of the Sheppard and Enoch Pratt Hospital, 398 F.2d 226 (4th Cir. 1968).

398 F.2d 226 (Cecil B. Sanner and Mary W. Sanner v. The Trustees of the Sheppard and Enoch Pratt Hospital) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Piselli v. 75th Street Medical
808 A.2d 508 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2002)
Palotai v. University of Maryland
38 F. App'x 946 (Fourth Circuit, 2002)
Serio v. Baltimore County
115 F. Supp. 2d 509 (D. Maryland, 2000)
Garnett v. State
632 A.2d 797 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1993)
Smallwood v. State
443 A.2d 1003 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 1982)
President of Georgetown College v. Madden
505 F. Supp. 557 (D. Maryland, 1980)
Schoonfield v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore
399 F. Supp. 1068 (D. Maryland, 1975)
Lovrinoff v. Helms Express, Inc.
309 F. Supp. 145 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1970)