Cbt Flint Partners, Llc v. Return Path, Inc.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
CBT FLINT PARTNERS, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
RETURN PATH, INC., Defendant-Appellee,
AND
CISCO IRONPORT SYSTEMS, LLC, Defendants-Appellees. ______________________
2012-1460,-1594 ______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia in No. 07-CV-1822, Judge Thomas W. Thrash Jr. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
DARYL L. JOSEFFER, King & Spalding, LLP, of Wash- ington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were ADAM M. CONRAD; BRUCE W. BABER, NATASHA H. MOFFITT and RUSSELL E. BLYTHE, of Atlanta, Georgia.
MATTHEW C. GAUDET, Duane Morris, LLP, of Atlanta, Georgia, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief were L. NORWOOD JAMESON and JOHN R. GIBSON. Of counsel on the brief was KENNETH L. BRESSLER, Blank Rome, LLP, of New York, New York.
______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (LOURIE, BRYSON, and PROST, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
April 11, 2013 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cbt Flint Partners, Llc v. Return Path, Inc. (Cbt Flint Partners, Llc v. Return Path, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.