Cbt Flint Partners, Llc v. Return Path, Inc.

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cbt Flint Partners, Llc v. Return Path, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 737 F.3d 1320
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided April 11, 2013·No. 12-1460·Published

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

CBT FLINT PARTNERS, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

RETURN PATH, INC., Defendant-Appellee,

AND

CISCO IRONPORT SYSTEMS, LLC, Defendants-Appellees. ______________________

2012-1460,-1594 ______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia in No. 07-CV-1822, Judge Thomas W. Thrash Jr. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

DARYL L. JOSEFFER, King & Spalding, LLP, of Wash- ington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were ADAM M. CONRAD; BRUCE W. BABER, NATASHA H. MOFFITT and RUSSELL E. BLYTHE, of Atlanta, Georgia.

MATTHEW C. GAUDET, Duane Morris, LLP, of Atlanta, Georgia, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief were L. NORWOOD JAMESON and JOHN R. GIBSON. Of counsel on the brief was KENNETH L. BRESSLER, Blank Rome, LLP, of New York, New York.

______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LOURIE, BRYSON, and PROST, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

April 11, 2013 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cbt Flint Partners, Llc v. Return Path, Inc., (Fed. Cir. 2013).

Cbt Flint Partners, Llc v. Return Path, Inc. (Cbt Flint Partners, Llc v. Return Path, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.