Cbt Flint Partners, Llc v. Return Path, Inc.

Federal Circuit

Cbt Flint Partners, Llc v. Return Path, Inc.

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DecidedApril 11, 2013

Docket12-1460

StatusPublished

This text of Cbt Flint Partners, Llc v. Return Path, Inc. (Cbt Flint Partners, Llc v. Return Path, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cbt Flint Partners, Llc v. Return Path, Inc., (Fed. Cir. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

CBT FLINT PARTNERS, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

RETURN PATH, INC., Defendant-Appellee,

AND

CISCO IRONPORT SYSTEMS, LLC, Defendants-Appellees. ______________________

2012-1460,-1594 ______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia in No. 07-CV-1822, Judge Thomas W. Thrash Jr. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

DARYL L. JOSEFFER, King & Spalding, LLP, of Wash- ington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were ADAM M. CONRAD; BRUCE W. BABER, NATASHA H. MOFFITT and RUSSELL E. BLYTHE, of Atlanta, Georgia.

MATTHEW C. GAUDET, Duane Morris, LLP, of Atlanta, Georgia, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief were L. NORWOOD JAMESON and JOHN R. GIBSON. Of counsel on the brief was KENNETH L. BRESSLER, Blank Rome, LLP, of New York, New York.

______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LOURIE, BRYSON, and PROST, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

April 11, 2013 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI