Cavanagh v. Lamanna
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-6505
JAMES CAVANAGH,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
JOHN LAMANNA, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution at Edgefield,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (3:05-cv-02842-RBH)
Submitted: June 21, 2007 Decided: June 29, 2007
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Cavanagh, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
James Cavanagh, a federal prisoner, appeals the district
court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge
and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we deny Cavanagh’s motion for appointment of counsel
and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cavanagh
v. Lamanna, No. 3:05-cv-02842-RBH (D.S.C. Mar. 22, 2007). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cavanagh v. Lamanna (Cavanagh v. Lamanna) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.