Cavanagh v. Lamanna

245 F. App'x 274
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 29, 2007·No. No. 07-6505·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

James Cavanagh, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Cavanagh’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cavanagh v. Lamanna, No. 3:05-cv-02842-RBH, 2007 WL 895473 (D.S.C. Mar. 22, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cavanagh v. Lamanna, 245 F. App'x 274 (4th Cir. 2007).

245 F. App'x 274 (Cavanagh v. Lamanna) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Goulet v. Hereford
W.D. Virginia, 2022
Garrett v. Fowler
D. South Carolina, 2021
Victor Andres Zelaya v. Commonwealth of Virginia
Court of Appeals of Virginia, 2020
Hutchinson v. West Virginia State Police
731 F. Supp. 2d 521 (S.D. West Virginia, 2010)