Caulkins v. Harris
9 Johns. 324
Opinion
The plaintiffs in this case are entitled io the 500 dollars, with six years’ interest thereon, and no more. This case comes within the rule settled in that of Staats v. The Executors of Ten Eyck; (3 Caines’ Rep. 111.) for the premises appear to have been actually enjoyed, and the mesne profits taken, by the grantee and his heirs. The judgment must, therefore, be for 710 dollars, and the costs.
Judgment accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Caulkins v. Harris, 9 Johns. 324 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1812).
9 Johns. 324 (Caulkins v. Harris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
De Long v. Spring Lake & Sea Girt Co.
47 A. 491 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1900)
Doctor v. Darling
22 N.Y.S. 594 (New York Supreme Court, 1893)
Mette v. Dow
77 Tenn. 93 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1882)
Messer v. Oestreich
10 N.W. 6 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1881)
Dalton v. Bowker
8 Nev. 190 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1873)
Noonan v. Ilsley
21 Wis. 138 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1866)
Cox's Administrators v. Henry
32 Pa. 18 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1858)
Fletcher v. Button
6 Barb. 646 (New York Supreme Court, 1849)
Spring v. Chase
22 Me. 505 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1843)
Cullum v. Branch of the Bank of Alabama
4 Ala. 21 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1842)
King v. Kerr's Administrators
5 Ohio 154 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1831)