Cattani v. Inc. Village of Ocean Beach

252 A.D.2d 533, 675 N.Y.S.2d 880, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8395
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 20, 1998
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 252 A.D.2d 533 (Cattani v. Inc. Village of Ocean Beach) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cattani v. Inc. Village of Ocean Beach, 252 A.D.2d 533, 675 N.Y.S.2d 880, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8395 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Gerard, J.), entered July 14, 1997, which granted the motion of the defendant Incorporated Vil[534]*534lage of Ocean Beach which was, in effect, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

On July 2, 1994, the infant plaintiff Jacqueline Gudmand sustained injuries as a result of a fall on a concrete walkway located within the Incorporated Village of Ocean Beach. It is undisputed that the Village had not received written notice of the alleged defective condition prior to the date of the accident. Moreover, there is no proof that the Village had actual or constructive notice of the alleged defective condition of the walkway, and the plaintiffs’ speculative and conclusory allegations were insufficient to raise a triable issue of fact with respect to whether the Village may have created the alleged defect through negligent repair (see, Sloan v Village of Hempstead, 223 AD2d 632; Mendes v Whitney-Floral Realty Corp., 216 AD2d 540; Tyschak v Incorporated Vil. of Westbury, 193 AD2d 670).

Accordingly, the court properly granted the motion of the Village which was, in effect, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as it was asserted against it (see, Village Law § 6-628; Kiernan v Thompson, 73 NY2d 840; Karnes v City of White Plains, 237 AD2d 574). Ritter, J. P., Santucci, Joy and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mollin v. County of Nassau
2 A.D.3d 600 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Skates v. City of New York
304 A.D.2d 820 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Ovisinak v. Town of Southold
277 A.D.2d 295 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
252 A.D.2d 533, 675 N.Y.S.2d 880, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8395, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cattani-v-inc-village-of-ocean-beach-nyappdiv-1998.