Catharina F. Costa v. Desert Palace, Inc., Dba Caesars Palace Hotel & Casino
274 F.3d 1306, 2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 10481, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 26897, 87 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 930, 2001 WL 1631526
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided December 19, 2001·No. 99-15645·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
ORDER
Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused regular active judges of this court, 1 *1307 it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.
1
. Judge Rawlinson was recused.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Catharina F. Costa v. Desert Palace, Inc., Dba Caesars Palace Hotel & Casino, 274 F.3d 1306, 2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 10481, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 26897, 87 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 930, 2001 WL 1631526 (9th Cir. 2001).
274 F.3d 1306 (Catharina F. Costa v. Desert Palace, Inc., Dba Caesars Palace Hotel & Casino) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Catharina F. Costa v. Desert Palace, Inc., Dba Caesars Palace Hotel & Casino
299 F.3d 838 (Ninth Circuit, 2002)