Catanese v. Furman
27 A.D.3d 1049, 810 N.Y.S.2d 720
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Catanese v. Furman. Read the opinion of the Court — 27 A.D.3d 1050 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 17, 2006·No. Appeal No. 1·Published
Opinion
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Chautauqua County (Frederick J. Marshall, J.), entered December 21, 2004 in a medical malpractice action. The order denied plaintiffs’ motion seeking, inter alia, to set aside the jury verdict.
It is hereby ordered that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs.
[1050]*1050Same memorandum as in Catanese v Furman (27 AD3d 1050 [2006]). Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Kehoe, Martoche, Smith and Pine, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Catanese v. Furman, 27 A.D.3d 1049, 810 N.Y.S.2d 720 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).
27 A.D.3d 1049 (Catanese v. Furman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Catanese v. Furman
27 A.D.3d 1050 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)