Catanese v. Furman

9 A.D.3d 864, 779 N.Y.S.2d 391
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Catanese v. Furman. Read the opinion of the Court — 27 A.D.3d 1050
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 9, 2004·No. Appeal No. 2·Published

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Chautauqua County (Joseph Gerace, J.), entered September 3, 2003 in an action to recover damages for medical malpractice. The order, inter alia, denied the motion of plaintiffs and their cross motion in limine to preclude defendants Donald J. Fur-man, M.D. and Women’s Christian Association Healthcare [865]*865System from offering evidence pertaining to a claim of negligence by defendant Alberto C. Gutierrez, M.D.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is modified on the law by granting plaintiffs’ cross motion in part and precluding defendant Donald J. Fur-man, M.D. from presenting a claim of negligence against defendant Alberto C. Gutierrez, M.D. and as modified the order is affirmed without costs in accordance with the same memorandum as in Catanese v Furman (9 AD3d 863 [2004]).

All concur except Green, J.P., and Gorski, J., who dissent and vote to dismiss the appeal in the same dissenting memorandum as in Catanese v Furman (9 AD3d 863, 864 [2004]). Present— Green, J.P., Hurlbutt, Kehoe, Gorski and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Catanese v. Furman, 9 A.D.3d 864, 779 N.Y.S.2d 391 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

9 A.D.3d 864 (Catanese v. Furman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Catanese v. Furman
9 A.D.3d 863 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)