Castle Nursing Homes, Inc. v. Sullivan

680 N.E.2d 1207, 79 Ohio St. 3d 230

Opinions

The appeal is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed on Propositions of Law Nos. I through IV.

The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on Proposition of Law No. V and remanded for reconsideration in light of our decision in Goldfuss v. Davidson (1997), 79 Ohio St.3d 116, 679 N.E.2d 1099.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur in part and dissent in part.