Castellani v. Scranton Times, L.P.

41 A.3d 1285, 615 Pa. 174, 2012 WL 1352877, 2012 Pa. LEXIS 858

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 18, 2012·No. 939 MAL 2011·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

*175 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 18th day of April 2012, the Application for Reconsideration is GRANTED and the question set forth in our Order dated March 30, 2012, is AMENDED as follows:

Whether the trial court erred in finding that Judge Garb’s memorandum issued on September 14, 2004 and Judge Feudale’s Opinion issued on June 29, 2005 were not admissible?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*175 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 18th day of April 2012, the Application for Reconsideration is GRANTED and the question set forth in our Order dated March 30, 2012, is AMENDED as follows:

Whether the trial court erred in finding that Judge Garb’s memorandum issued on September 14, 2004 and Judge Feudale’s Opinion issued on June 29, 2005 were not admissible?

Castellani v. Scranton Times, L.P., 41 A.3d 1285, 615 Pa. 174, 2012 WL 1352877, 2012 Pa. LEXIS 858 (Pa. 2012).

Pincite

41 A.3d 1285 (Castellani v. Scranton Times, L.P.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Castellani, R., Aplts. v. Scranton Times

124 A.3d 1229 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2015)

Opinion

Related