Castellani v. Scranton Times, L.P.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Castellani v. Scranton Times, L.P.

41 A.3d 852, 615 Pa. 147, 2012 WL 1059385, 2012 Pa. LEXIS 691

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided March 30, 2012·No. 939 MAL 2011·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 30th day of March, 2012, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED and the matter is REMANDED to the Superior Court to address the following issue certified by the trial judge below:

Whether the trial court erred in finding that Judge Garb’s memorandum issued on September 14, 2004 and Judge Feudale’s Opinion issued on June 29, 2005 were not admissible under Pa.R.Evid. 201 (Judicial Notice of Adjudicative Facts)?

*148 The Emergency Application for Stay is GRANTED and the matter is stayed pending resolution of the certified question before the Superior Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 30th day of March, 2012, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED and the matter is REMANDED to the Superior Court to address the following issue certified by the trial judge below:

Whether the trial court erred in finding that Judge Garb’s memorandum issued on September 14, 2004 and Judge Feudale’s Opinion issued on June 29, 2005 were not admissible under Pa.R.Evid. 201 (Judicial Notice of Adjudicative Facts)?

*148 The Emergency Application for Stay is GRANTED and the matter is stayed pending resolution of the certified question before the Superior Court.

Castellani v. Scranton Times, L.P., 41 A.3d 852, 615 Pa. 147, 2012 WL 1059385, 2012 Pa. LEXIS 691 (Pa. 2012).

Pincite

41 A.3d 852 (Castellani v. Scranton Times, L.P.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related