Castelazo & Associates v. United States
47 Cust. Ct. 239
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Castelazo & Associates v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 47 Cust. Ct. 365 →
United States Customs Court·Decided June 26, 1961·No. No. 65845; protest 59/21552 (Los Angeles)·Published
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of 61 barrels (33,106 pounds) of rejected boneless beef, unfit for human consumption as beef or meat, and fit only for processing into animal food, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained. United States v. Judson-Sheldon Corp. (37 C.C.P.A. 89, C.A.D. 424) and Atlas Canning Company, Inc. v. United States (41 Cust. Ct. 242, C.D. 2047), followed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Castelazo & Associates v. United States, 47 Cust. Ct. 239 (cusc 1961).
47 Cust. Ct. 239 (Castelazo & Associates v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. Judson-Sheldon Corp.
37 C.C.P.A. 89 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1950)
Atlas Canning Co. v. United States
41 Cust. Ct. 242 (U.S. Customs Court, 1958)