Castelazo & Associates v. United States
44 Cust. Ct. 505
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Castelazo & Associates v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 47 Cust. Ct. 365 →
United States Customs Court·Decided June 15, 1960·No. No. 64292; protest 59/18010, etc. (Los Angeles)·Published
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of “triangles, squares, adjustable triangles, rules, French curves, and protractors, composed of acrylic plastic containing no filler material, and are not similar in use to any enumerated dutiable article,” the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Castelazo & Associates v. United States, 44 Cust. Ct. 505 (cusc 1960).
44 Cust. Ct. 505 (Castelazo & Associates v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.