Casson v. Bosman
This text of 45 A.2d 807 (Casson v. Bosman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Complainants appeal from a decree dismissing his bill seeking to compel the directors of the respondent corporation to declare a dividend, “in a reasonable amount, in cash,” for the year ending December 31st, 1943, and at regular intervals thereafter. We have concluded that the decree should be affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of the learned Vice-Chancellor; but we think that, under all the circumstances, appellant should not have been burdened with a counsel fee or the cost of the transcript of the testimony.
The decree is modified accordingly.
For affirmance — Case, Donges, Wells, Dill, Freund, JJ. 5.
For modification — The Chiee-Justice, Parker, Bodine, Hbher, Perskie, Colie, Oliphant, Raeeerty, McGeehan, JJ. 9.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
45 A.2d 807, 137 N.J. Eq. 532, 1946 N.J. LEXIS 395, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/casson-v-bosman-nj-1946.