Cassel v. Randall

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Cassel v. Randall

73 S.E. 858, 10 Ga. App. 587, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 621

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 15, 1912

Docket3438

StatusPublished

Cited by14 cases

This text of 73 S.E. 858 (Cassel v. Randall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cassel v. Randall, 73 S.E. 858, 10 Ga. App. 587, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 621 (Ga. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

Hill, C. J.

Where the plaintiff’s evidence shows that letters were written and duly mailed, properly addressed to the defendant, a presumption arises that they were received. This presumption is rebuttable, and is entirely overcome by the uncontradicted evidence of the defendant that the letters were never received. Hamilton v. Stewart, 108 Ga. 476 (34 S. E. 123), and citations.

2. The duty of the landlord to make repairs does not arise until he has knowledge of defects. The tenant, being in possession, must notify the [588]*588landlord of the need for repairs. Dougherty v. Taylor & Norton Co., 5 Ga. App. 776 (63 S. E. 928); Ocean Steamship Co. v. Hamilton, 112 Ga. 901 (38 S. E. 204) ; White v. Montgomery, 58 Ga. 204.

Decided January 15, 1912. Rehearing denied February 27, 1912.

Action for damages; from city court of Macon — Judge Hodges.

March 26, 1911. R. S. Wimberly, for plaintiffs. Lane & Park, for defendant.

3. Where the tenant and the landlord live in different cities, and the custom during the tenancy, for several years, has been for the tenant to make needed repairs and charge the cost of the repairs in the settlement of rent, the landlord has the right to assume that this custom will continue during the tenancy, unless expressly notified by the tenant to the contrary.

4. The uncontradicted evidence in this case showing that the landlord did not know of the necessity for making the 'repairs, and that the tenant had been in the habit, for several years, of making all needed repairs on the premises and deducting the costs therefor from the rent, which, practice had been acquiesced in by the landlord, and the landlord had • not been informed by the tenant of any discontinuance of such practice, the landlord was not liable for any damage to the property of the tenant caused by want of repairs; and a nonsuit was properly awarded.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hill, C. J.

Where the plaintiff’s evidence shows that letters were written and duly mailed, properly addressed to the defendant, a presumption arises that they were received. This presumption is rebuttable, and is entirely overcome by the uncontradicted evidence of the defendant that the letters were never received. Hamilton v. Stewart, 108 Ga. 476 (34 S. E. 123), and citations.

2. The duty of the landlord to make repairs does not arise until he has knowledge of defects. The tenant, being in possession, must notify the [588]*588landlord of the need for repairs. Dougherty v. Taylor & Norton Co., 5 Ga. App. 776 (63 S. E. 928); Ocean Steamship Co. v. Hamilton, 112 Ga. 901 (38 S. E. 204) ; White v. Montgomery, 58 Ga. 204.

Decided January 15, 1912. Rehearing denied February 27, 1912.

Action for damages; from city court of Macon — Judge Hodges.

March 26, 1911. R. S. Wimberly, for plaintiffs. Lane & Park, for defendant.

3. Where the tenant and the landlord live in different cities, and the custom during the tenancy, for several years, has been for the tenant to make needed repairs and charge the cost of the repairs in the settlement of rent, the landlord has the right to assume that this custom will continue during the tenancy, unless expressly notified by the tenant to the contrary.

4. The uncontradicted evidence in this case showing that the landlord did not know of the necessity for making the 'repairs, and that the tenant had been in the habit, for several years, of making all needed repairs on the premises and deducting the costs therefor from the rent, which, practice had been acquiesced in by the landlord, and the landlord had • not been informed by the tenant of any discontinuance of such practice, the landlord was not liable for any damage to the property of the tenant caused by want of repairs; and a nonsuit was properly awarded.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

73 S.E. 858, 10 Ga. App. 587, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 621, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cassel-v-randall-gactapp-1912.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack