Cassandra Gaines, as Surviving Parent of Kirsten Boykin v. Pediatrix Medical Group of Georgia, P.C.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Cassandra Gaines, as Surviving Parent of Kirsten Boykin v. Pediatrix Medical Group of Georgia, P.C.

DecidedOctober 25, 2019

DocketA20A0431

StatusPublished

This text of Cassandra Gaines, as Surviving Parent of Kirsten Boykin v. Pediatrix Medical Group of Georgia, P.C. (Cassandra Gaines, as Surviving Parent of Kirsten Boykin v. Pediatrix Medical Group of Georgia, P.C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cassandra Gaines, as Surviving Parent of Kirsten Boykin v. Pediatrix Medical Group of Georgia, P.C., (Ga. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ October 21, 2019

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A20A0431. CASSANDRA GAINES, AS SURVIVING PARENT OF KIRSTEN BOYKIN et al. v. PEDIATRIX MEDICAL GROUP OF GEORGIA, P.C. et al.

In 2015, Cassandra Gaines and James Boykin, as surviving parents of Kirsten Boykin (“the Plaintiffs”), filed a wrongful death suit against Pediatrix Medical Group of Georgia, P.C. and Taylor Lyn Noto, NNP (“the Defendants”). In 2019 – shortly before the scheduled trial – the Plaintiffs amended their complaint to add a theory of liability. The Defendants filed a motion in limine to exclude the new claim, and the trial court granted the motion. The Plaintiffs appeal, asserting that the trial court’s ruling served as a de facto grant of summary judgment, which may be appealed directly under OCGA § 9-11-56 (h). As this Court has held, summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56 constitutes a ruling on the merits of a claim. See Forest City Gun Club v. Chatham County, 280 Ga. App. 219, 221 (633 SE2d 623) (2006). Here, the trial court’s order did not address the merits of the Plaintiffs’ claim. Rather, the order pertained to the Plaintiffs’ ability to amend their complaint to include the claim. The trial court’s order is thus interlocutory. See Wolf v. Richmond County Hosp. Auth., 169 Ga. App. 68, 68 (311 SE2d 507) (1983). In order to appeal, the Plaintiffs were required to comply with the interlocutory appeal procedure in OCGA § 5-6-34 (b). See id. Their failure to do so deprives this Court of jurisdiction over this appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED. Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 10/21/2019 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ October 21, 2019

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A20A0431. CASSANDRA GAINES, AS SURVIVING PARENT OF KIRSTEN BOYKIN et al. v. PEDIATRIX MEDICAL GROUP OF GEORGIA, P.C. et al.

In 2015, Cassandra Gaines and James Boykin, as surviving parents of Kirsten Boykin (“the Plaintiffs”), filed a wrongful death suit against Pediatrix Medical Group of Georgia, P.C. and Taylor Lyn Noto, NNP (“the Defendants”). In 2019 – shortly before the scheduled trial – the Plaintiffs amended their complaint to add a theory of liability. The Defendants filed a motion in limine to exclude the new claim, and the trial court granted the motion. The Plaintiffs appeal, asserting that the trial court’s ruling served as a de facto grant of summary judgment, which may be appealed directly under OCGA § 9-11-56 (h). As this Court has held, summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56 constitutes a ruling on the merits of a claim. See Forest City Gun Club v. Chatham County, 280 Ga. App. 219, 221 (633 SE2d 623) (2006). Here, the trial court’s order did not address the merits of the Plaintiffs’ claim. Rather, the order pertained to the Plaintiffs’ ability to amend their complaint to include the claim. The trial court’s order is thus interlocutory. See Wolf v. Richmond County Hosp. Auth., 169 Ga. App. 68, 68 (311 SE2d 507) (1983). In order to appeal, the Plaintiffs were required to comply with the interlocutory appeal procedure in OCGA § 5-6-34 (b). See id. Their failure to do so deprives this Court of jurisdiction over this appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED. Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 10/21/2019 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Cassandra Gaines, as Surviving Parent of Kirsten Boykin v. Pediatrix Medical Group of Georgia, P.C., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cassandra-gaines-as-surviving-parent-of-kirsten-boykin-v-pediatrix-gactapp-2019.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack