Cassady v. State
486 So. 2d 457, 1986 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 5947
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cassady v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1984 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 5119 →
Opinion
In accordance with Cassady v. State, 486 So.2d 453 (Ala.1986), we hold that the four indictments, each charging possession of a forged instrument in the second degree, upon which Cassady’s convictions rest, should have been dismissed pursuant to the terms of the same negotiated plea agreement controlling the disposition of the Cas-sady indictments; like the underlying indictments in Cassady, the instant indictments were in direct contravention to the plea agreement. Accordingly, this cause is reversed and rendered.
REVERSED AND RENDERED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cassady v. State, 486 So. 2d 457, 1986 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 5947 (Ala. Ct. App. 1986).
486 So. 2d 457 (Cassady v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ex Parte Cassady
486 So. 2d 453 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1986)