Cassady v. State

486 So. 2d 457, 1986 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 5947
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
DecidedFebruary 25, 1986
Docket1 Div. 805
StatusPublished

This text of 486 So. 2d 457 (Cassady v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cassady v. State, 486 So. 2d 457, 1986 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 5947 (Ala. Ct. App. 1986).

Opinion

PATTERSON, Judge.

In accordance with Cassady v. State, 486 So.2d 453 (Ala.1986), we hold that the four indictments, each charging possession of a forged instrument in the second degree, upon which Cassady’s convictions rest, should have been dismissed pursuant to the terms of the same negotiated plea agreement controlling the disposition of the Cas-sady indictments; like the underlying indictments in Cassady, the instant indictments were in direct contravention to the plea agreement. Accordingly, this cause is reversed and rendered.

REVERSED AND RENDERED.

All the Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Cassady
486 So. 2d 453 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
486 So. 2d 457, 1986 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 5947, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cassady-v-state-alacrimapp-1986.