Cassady v. State
This text of 486 So. 2d 457 (Cassady v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In accordance with Cassady v. State, 486 So.2d 453 (Ala.1986), we hold that the four indictments, each charging possession of a forged instrument in the second degree, upon which Cassady’s convictions rest, should have been dismissed pursuant to the terms of the same negotiated plea agreement controlling the disposition of the Cas-sady indictments; like the underlying indictments in Cassady, the instant indictments were in direct contravention to the plea agreement. Accordingly, this cause is reversed and rendered.
REVERSED AND RENDERED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
486 So. 2d 457, 1986 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 5947, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cassady-v-state-alacrimapp-1986.