Casey v. Brennan
801 A.2d 245, 173 N.J. 177, 2002 N.J. LEXIS 1071
Opinions
Based on the Court’s grant of a cross-petition for certification filed by plaintiffs Kathryn Caesy and Sheila Gagliano, 170 N.J. 389 (2001), the sole issue before us is whether appellants can be considered statutory dissenters pursuant to N.J.S.A. 14A:11-1 in connection with their efforts to secure an award of counsel and expert fees.1 In respect of that issue, the judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Steinberg. 344 N.J.Super. 83, 780 A.2d 553 (2001).
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Casey v. Brennan, 801 A.2d 245, 173 N.J. 177, 2002 N.J. LEXIS 1071 (N.J. 2002).
801 A.2d 245 (Casey v. Brennan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Pradeep Khanna v. Sandeep Kalra
New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2026
Christopher Regan v. Brad Conway
New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2025
ALBEE v. ALBEE
E.D. Pennsylvania, 2024
Robert Sipko v. Koger, Inc. (085022) (Bergen County & Statewide)
Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2022
ROBERT SIPKO VS. KOGER, INC. (C-000393-07, BERGEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (CONSOLIDATED)
New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2020
DeNike v. Cupo
926 A.2d 869 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2007)
Welch v. via Christi Health Partners, Inc.
133 P.3d 122 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 2006)
State v. P.L.
848 A.2d 861 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2004)
Penobscot Shoe Co. v. McCulloch
Maine Superior, 2003
Casey v. Brennan
801 A.2d 245 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2002)