Casey v. Brennan

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Casey v. Brennan

801 A.2d 245, 173 N.J. 177, 2002 N.J. LEXIS 1071

CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey

DecidedJuly 16, 2002

StatusPublished

Cited by10 cases

This text of 801 A.2d 245 (Casey v. Brennan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Casey v. Brennan, 801 A.2d 245, 173 N.J. 177, 2002 N.J. LEXIS 1071 (N.J. 2002).

Pincite

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Based on the Court’s grant of a cross-petition for certification filed by plaintiffs Kathryn Caesy and Sheila Gagliano, 170 N.J. 389 (2001), the sole issue before us is whether appellants can be considered statutory dissenters pursuant to N.J.S.A. 14A:11-1 in connection with their efforts to secure an award of counsel and expert fees.¹ In respect of that issue, the judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Steinberg. 344 N.J.Super. 83, 780 A.2d 553 (2001).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Based on the Court’s grant of a cross-petition for certification filed by plaintiffs Kathryn Caesy and Sheila Gagliano, 170 N.J. 389 (2001), the sole issue before us is whether appellants can be considered statutory dissenters pursuant to N.J.S.A. 14A:11-1 in connection with their efforts to secure an award of counsel and expert fees.¹ In respect of that issue, the judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Steinberg. 344 N.J.Super. 83, 780 A.2d 553 (2001).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

801 A.2d 245, 173 N.J. 177, 2002 N.J. LEXIS 1071, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/casey-v-brennan-nj-2002.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack