Casey v. Brennan

801 A.2d 245, 173 N.J. 177, 2002 N.J. LEXIS 1071
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided July 16, 2002·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Based on the Court’s grant of a cross-petition for certification filed by plaintiffs Kathryn Caesy and Sheila Gagliano, 170 N.J. 389 (2001), the sole issue before us is whether appellants can be considered statutory dissenters pursuant to N.J.S.A. 14A:11-1 in connection with their efforts to secure an award of counsel and expert fees.1 In respect of that issue, the judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Steinberg. 344 N.J.Super. 83, 780 A.2d 553 (2001).

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Casey v. Brennan, 801 A.2d 245, 173 N.J. 177, 2002 N.J. LEXIS 1071 (N.J. 2002).

801 A.2d 245 (Casey v. Brennan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pradeep Khanna v. Sandeep Kalra
New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2026
Christopher Regan v. Brad Conway
New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2025
ALBEE v. ALBEE
E.D. Pennsylvania, 2024
DeNike v. Cupo
926 A.2d 869 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2007)
Welch v. via Christi Health Partners, Inc.
133 P.3d 122 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 2006)
State v. P.L.
848 A.2d 861 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2004)
Casey v. Brennan
801 A.2d 245 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2002)