Case v. Stewart
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-1052
JAMES DAVID CASE, as Personal Representative for the Estate of David Scott Case,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
and
DAVID SCOTT CASE, deceased,
Plaintiff,
versus
M. C. STEWART; GASTON COUNTY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. David C. Keesler, Magistrate Judge. (3:03-cv-00388)
Submitted: September 28, 2007 Decided: June 3, 2008
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Richard J. Lutzel, LUTZEL, GANDY & BROADWAY, PLLC, Mooresville, North Carolina, for Appellant. Martha Raymond Thompson, STOTT, HOLLOWELL, PALMER & WINDHAM, Gastonia, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 - PER CURIAM:
James David Case, as personal representative of the
estate of his son, David Scott Case, appeals the magistrate judge’s
order* granting summary judgment to Officer M.C. Stewart and Gaston
County, North Carolina, on Case’s claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(2000) and state law. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the magistrate judge. See Case v. Stewart, No. 3:03-cv-00388
(W.D.N.C. Jan. 4, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* The parties consented to exercise of jurisdiction by a U.S. magistrate judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000).
- 3 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Case v. Stewart (Case v. Stewart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.