Case v. Stewart

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJune 3, 2008
Docket07-1052
StatusUnpublished

This text of Case v. Stewart (Case v. Stewart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Case v. Stewart, (4th Cir. 2008).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-1052

JAMES DAVID CASE, as Personal Representative for the Estate of David Scott Case,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

and

DAVID SCOTT CASE, deceased,

Plaintiff,

versus

M. C. STEWART; GASTON COUNTY,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. David C. Keesler, Magistrate Judge. (3:03-cv-00388)

Submitted: September 28, 2007 Decided: June 3, 2008

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard J. Lutzel, LUTZEL, GANDY & BROADWAY, PLLC, Mooresville, North Carolina, for Appellant. Martha Raymond Thompson, STOTT, HOLLOWELL, PALMER & WINDHAM, Gastonia, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

- 2 - PER CURIAM:

James David Case, as personal representative of the

estate of his son, David Scott Case, appeals the magistrate judge’s

order* granting summary judgment to Officer M.C. Stewart and Gaston

County, North Carolina, on Case’s claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2000) and state law. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the magistrate judge. See Case v. Stewart, No. 3:03-cv-00388

(W.D.N.C. Jan. 4, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* The parties consented to exercise of jurisdiction by a U.S. magistrate judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000).

- 3 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Case v. Stewart, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/case-v-stewart-ca4-2008.